|
BF = 27.4
BW = 52.8
BMI= 28.1
Upped cals due to rapid loss , "slowly,slowly , catchy monkey " !
Today was funeral day , very litte tracking on lunch .. couple of drinks (tracked)
Small party size sausage roll and very small bit of Coffe and walnut cake.
|
83.9 kg
Lost so far: 2.8 kg.
Still to go: 11.3 kg.
Diet followed: Reasonably Well.
|
|
1514 kcal
|
Fat: 35.39g | Prot: 139.50g | Carbs: 113.70g.
Breakfast: Bananas, Egg White, Tuna in Water (Canned), Sainsbury's Skimmed-Milk, Skyr Yogurt, Porridge. Lunch: Red Table Wine, Peroni Lager (Bottle). Dinner: Sun-Pat Crunchy Peanut Butter, Red Sweet Pepper, Celery, Cucumber (with Peel), Chicken Breast, Broccoli (Spears, without Salt, Frozen, Drained, Cooked, Boiled), Cauliflower, Skyr Yogurt. more...
|
|
2256 kcal
|
Exercise:
Driving - 4 hours, Resting - 12 hours, Sleeping - 8 hours. more...
|
Losing 3.2 kg a Week
|
 Comments
Hello Pagan. I've lost weight quite quickly this week too, this is my first week, and I've seen that a slower weight loss is better. Truth be told I've been happy with a much lower calorie consumption and I'm actually eating much healthier. Would you be able to tell me why a slower weight loss is better? Thanks.
25 Apr 23 by member: M' Lord
|
Hi,
One reason is that rapid weight loss can mean that more muscle mass is lost than if the weight loss is gradual; thus lowering the rate at which it burns calories.
Lean muscle burns more cals at rest. I have upped my cals a little to slow it down.
25 Apr 23 by member: PaganBlacksmith
|
Thanks for your help Pagan, I'll consider this on my weight loss journey.
25 Apr 23 by member: M' Lord
|
M' Lord I think slower weight loss is considered more sustainable long term but if you're just starting out I wouldn't worry too much as it's often quicker in the beginning anyway, especially if you've made some big changes
26 Apr 23 by member: bryony_pudding
|
| |
|
|
| |
Submit a Comment
You must sign in to submit a comment. Click here to sign in.
|
|
|
PaganBlacksmith's Weight History
|